Fresh-firecoal Chestnut-falls and Finches’ Wings: In Praise of Diversity

chermoyaI give you the humble cherimoya. I’d seen them before occasionally, but until we moved to Spain I’d never tried one. It’s a fruit, you know, about the size of a large orange, green-skinned but a creamy, custardy-white on the inside – the other common name is ‘custard apple.’ The taste is somewhere between a pear, a banana, and generic tropical-fruitiness, and they’re delicious.

It’s rare that I come upon an entirely new food, and it makes me wonder what else is out there that I’ve been missing. A stroll around a Costa Rican market will tell me – a lot. Just the mangoes come in 5 or 6 different shapes, sizes and colors. There are untold numbers of amazing foods I’ve never even seen, and that most people will never experience.

Tell me – how many varieties of apples are available in your local supermarket? A half dozen, probably, if it’s a good one. I know an organic farmer in Hungary who grows 208 varieties of apples and 64 kinds of pears. Creighton Lee Calhoun, in his book Old Southern Applesdescribes over 1600 apple varieties, many of which are now extinct.  That doesn’t seem even remotely possible for those of us who are accustomed to the homogenized gleam of identical waxed Red Delicious. Old-Smokehouse-Apple

Chardonnay, Merlot, and Cabernet Sauvignon? How about Albariño, Verdejo, Macabeo, and Carignan? Those are just a few of the grape varieties used for wine here in Spain that are new to me, and it turns out there are hundreds upon hundreds of varieties around the world that are as good – or better – than the handful we regularly find on our supermarket shelves.

Now let me ask you this. How many languages are there in the world? Let’s see. The planet is currently carved up into something like 192 sovereign nations. Many speak only one language, but some, Switzerland for example, have 4 or more official languages. Let’s go out on a limb and say that the average is 5 languages per country. That would be…(carry the 1)…960 distinct tongues.

The Tower of Babel

The Tower of Babel

There are about 7000 languages in the world. New Guinea alone holds about 1,000, Nigeria 527, Cameroon 286, and the island nation of Vanuatu, slightly smaller than the state of Connecticut, 110. And I’m talking distinct, mutually unintelligible languages here, not dialects of the same language.

Spain, you may be surprised to learn, has at least 7 separate languages (Castilian, Basque, Catalan, Galician, Aragonese, Asturian, and Leonese), some of which are used as the primary language of regional government and education, with Spanish (Castilian) considered secondary.

Many of these languages, though, are facing extinction. “If the present rate of language disappearance continues,” notes Jared Diamond in The World Until Yesterday, “then by the year 2100 most of the world’s current languages will either be extinct, or else will be moribund languages spoken only by old people and no longer being transmitted from parents to children.”

And speaking of extinction, scientists have named and cataloged about 1.3 million species of animals. Each year, on average, around 15,000 new species are discovered, and a recent study suggests that the total number of animal species on Earth is  around 8.7 million – although the number could be as high as 30 million. The fact is we’ll never know, since many species will be exterminated before we even have a chance to discover their existence.endangered-species

Envision the planet as one large house with many rooms. We’ve taken stock of the contents of one small bedroom, while the rest of the house is being demolished. We’re losing species at a rate of roughly 5000 times the ‘normal’ or ‘background’ rate of extinction, thought to be one to two species per year.

So what do cherimoyas, languages, and the number of animal species have in common? Diversity.

A diet rich in a diverse range of foods, particularly of different fruits and vegetables, is not only more interesting and gratifying, it’s far healthier as well. The World Health Organization claims that a “varied diet is an important step towards a happy and healthy lifestyle,” protecting the body against “noncommunicable diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, some types of cancer and skeletal conditions.” But any grade-school child familiar with the food pyramid could tell you that.

Fair enough, but okay, really, who cares about losing languages? Isn’t it better for everyone to be able to communicate freely and easily, and wouldn’t it be advantageous if everyone spoke the same language? (Well, if we were to ditch the cacophony of world languages for the one spoken by the most people, then we’d be chucking English for Mandarin Chinese. You’re okay with that, right?)

The fact is, around the world the increasing majority of people is bi- or multi-lingual anyway, and translation software is readily and easily available, so having a diversity of languages is not much of a problem. As for the benefits, they are manifold.

helloFirst of all, if the hypothesis of linguistic relativism is accurate, then language molds thought just as thought molds languages – that is, that speakers of different languages view, conceptualize, and experience the world differently in part as a function of the language or languages they speak. Language is a lens through which its speakers see everything around them, and the more ways of looking at a challenge mean a higher probability of meeting it.

Secondly, language is a repository of a culture, of literature, of knowledge. Lose the language, and you lose all that it encoded and all that it expressed. Imagine if the only access we had to Shakespeare, now and forevermore, was in German translation:

Sein oder nicht sein: das ist die Frage:
Ob ‘S edler in den Geist auf die Pfeil’ und Schleudern des wütenden Geschicks,
oder zu Waffen gegen ein Meer von Nöten,
und durch Widerstand sie enden?

Thirdly, language provides a sense of identity and community that has clear benefits. “Groups whose language and culture disintegrate tend to lose their pride and mutual self-support,” writes Diamond. This can be seen in many communities, and he provides a couple of examples. “Cherokee Indians who complete Cherokee language school and remain bilingual in Cherokee and English are more likely to pursue their education, obtain jobs, and earn higher salaries than Cherokees who can’t speak Cherokee. Aboriginal Australians who learn their traditional tribal language and culture are less prone to substance abuse than are culturally disconnected Aborigines.”

Clearly, language diversity has tremendous advantages and few downsides.

BiodiversityAnd biological diversity? Imagine you’re hanging by a braided nylon rope, 1,200 feet up the sheer side of Yosemite’s El Capitan. You have about 1,800 more feet to go before you reach the safety of the summit. With each foot you rise, someone at the top snips one thread in those braids. Each thread is a species. You might be okay for another thousand feet, but each one of those threads reinforces the others, and at some point there simply won’t be enough left to support your weight. You’re going to die.

“From pollination of our crops by bees, to carbon storage by our forests, and even the bacteria in our mouths, we rely upon biodiversity for our very existence,” writes Euan Ritchie, professor at Australia’s Deakin University. “We neglect this at our own peril.”

The United Nations Environment Program states that “The complex web of inter-dependent ecosystems which constitute life on Earth includes us. We are part of that web and are entirely dependent on clean air, fresh water and healthy food for our survival,” and the Convention on Biodiversity sums it up succinctly: “At least 40 per cent of the world’s economy and 80 per cent of the needs of the poor are derived from biological resources. In addition, the richer the diversity of life, the greater the opportunity for medical discoveries, economic development, and adaptive responses to such new challenges as climate change.”

PassPigeons

Passenger pigeons once numbered in the billions. They were wiped out in less than 50 years.

We live in an increasingly homogenized, globalized world. This has brought some tangible benefits, but also has incurred costs – some smaller (only six varieties of apples at the megasuperultra store), some larger (the death of thousands of languages, the loss of thousands of species and the potential loss of millions).

Diversity, in pretty much whatever form it takes – biological, religious, linguistic, racial – creates strength, richness, durability. (I mean, imagine if the US Congress consisted of only 18% women and 8% and 7% Blacks and Latinos, respectively – it would just be a bunch of old white guys who couldn’t get anything constructive done. Oh, wait.)

Diversity is not only desirable, it is essential.

With the aid of a prism or a rain shower, ordinary white light can be broken into its component colors. Now tell me, which is more fascinating, more compelling, and more beautiful – a florescent bulb, or a rainbow?

8 thoughts on “Fresh-firecoal Chestnut-falls and Finches’ Wings: In Praise of Diversity

  1. Excellent thoughts- makes me wonder about 1st century Christianity which was birthed by Greek Speaking Judeans and Galileans- How did that perspective form and change Christianity?

    Like

  2. Okay…I now have a headache! 😉 As if I didn’t already have enough to worry about….

    Have a great weekend of pondering!

    Cheers,
    David

    Like

      • Matt, during our last trip in the Winter of 2005 to Kazakhstan (Uralsk); we were able to hang out at a local High School. During a brief visit to an English class, we were told that they had been reintroducing the Kazakh language in schools. At that point they were focusing on Kazakh and English, with Russian reduced to a much lower priority.

        Hopefully it has worked out well for them and that is one language saved. 😉

        (As of February 2013 (source – CIA World Factbook) their literacy rate among adults (15+) is 99.5%.)

        Cheers!
        David

        Like

        • That’s great to hear, David! Reviving dying languages is definitely worthwhile, and the former Soviet republics are doing it as a way to restore national identity. I wish them the best of luck.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s